 |
Indices and Benchmarks –
We Can’t Live Without Them,
So We Better Figure Out How to Live With Them |
Indices:
are they up or down?
Benchmarks: are we ahead or behind? |
Asset
managers measure their success or failure based on their performance relative
to indices and benchmarks. Although they have been around for decades,
we have recently seen a rapid growth in the number of indices being published,
and the complexity of benchmarks being tracked.
It is readily apparent that new investment strategies are being developed and
implemented at an ever increasing rate – the race for alpha has not slowed.
New structured products seem to come to market almost daily. Derivatives have
become a management challenge for even the most conservative asset managers.
Hedge funds, private equity, emerging markets, exchange traded funds – the
list of investment vehicles (and their associated alphabet soup of acronyms)
seems endless.
If there is a constant in this dynamic and volatile environment, it is the questions:
Are these complex strategies worth it? How well do these strategies perform?
Is there sufficient return to justify the increased risk and operational complexity?
While the answers may not always be obvious, one of the constant threads behind
each of them is the need to measure performance – and performance is always
measured against a benchmark.
John Clark, Principal of Cutter Consulting™ observes “as our clients’ investment
strategies become more complex, the challenge of identifying and calculating
the most appropriate benchmark also grows. For example, as firms move beyond
total return driven strategies to liability driven investing, the ability to
develop accurate benchmarks that combine liability matching with total return
poses an even greater challenge.” The index providers are scrambling to
meet these demands.
Is the data I want/need available?
Asset management firms are struggling to identify the most appropriate benchmark
against which to measure the performance of their latest investment product and
strategy. Sometimes the appropriate benchmark is obvious (I want to increase
my exposure to government bonds in Japan, what is an appropriate benchmark?),
and sometimes it is not (I want to increase my exposure to private equity, what
is an appropriate benchmark?).
Once asset management firms have identified an appropriate benchmark, they are
faced with the challenge of tracking it. They are faced with a number of choices:
 |
Does one of the index data providers already provide an
appropriate index? If so, can I get it through my redistributor? |
 |
Will one of the index data providers calculate a custom index to support
my investment strategy? If so, will they make it available to me through
my redistributor? |
 |
Do I have, or can I get, the data to build the benchmark myself? If so,
what construction methodology should I use? How will I verify the accuracy
and integrity of my calculations? |
 |
Are there any other options available to me? |
Index data providers and redistributors are devoting tremendous resources
to these issues:
 |
Virtually all of the major index providers are
publishing new global index families, revising and/or extending existing
index families and individual indices, and developing custom indices to
meet individual client demands |
 |
Redistributors are adding new index families and indices to their product
offerings as driven by client demand |
| … in the News … |
 |
IDFC Partners FTSE in Creation of New India Infrastructure
Index Series |
 |
MSCI Barra Launches Global Family of Islamic
Indices |
 |
Russell Launches Global Equity Indexes |
 |
S&P Expands Global Thematic Index Series |
|
Okay, I can get the data I need – what do I do with it?
Index specific data faces the same challenges as the broader category of reference
data:
 |
How do I insure it is accurate? How do I enrich it if necessary? |
 |
Where do I store it? |
 |
How do I distribute it? |
 |
Do I have (or can I put in place) license agreements that allow me to
meet my business requirements? |
There
are almost as many approaches to answering these questions as there are asset
management firms. Manual processes for gathering and entering index data coexist
with automated feeds from vendors. Sometimes index data is imported directly
into individual applications, and sometimes into a shared data store. Benchmarks
are often calculated in a single application and shared as needed, while in
other cases the same benchmark may be calculated multiple times.
| When indices and their constituents are considered, data
volume is a huge challenge to asset managers. Data cleansing, validation
and enrichment take on a dimension of practical necessity, but many firms
wonder if this approach is truly “good enough”. |
|
“… we
have 12,000 securities
in our asset file that represent
positions in our portfolios, but
the indices we track include
over 100,000 securities …”
- leading global asset manager
|
Both index providers and redistributors recognize that data volume and consistency
is a major challenge for their clients, but their ability to offer practical
solutions is limited:
 |
An increased emphasis on data completeness and data quality
is part of the marketing message of every service provider |
 |
Although virtually all redistributors only deliver “official” index
data, most of them take on a role of advocacy with the data providers,
validating data and questioning perceived anomalies with individual index
providers to ease the data cleansing challenge for their clients |
 |
Redistributors are actively trying to ease the internal processing burden
of asset management firms by offering common formatting and single sourcing
for data from multiple index providers |
 |
When permitted by the index provider, many redistributors are offering
data and sometimes calculations that are not available directly from the
index provider |
This is a big problem – what can I do?
Index and benchmark data management is a critical challenge to asset management
firms. Whether addressed within the context of reference data management or
whether it is or becomes a project on its own, it is ultimately critical to
the firm. The long term success of the firm is very often determined by the
answer to the questions “are we ahead of or behind our benchmarks, and
why?” Timely, accurate responses to these questions often make the difference
between success and failure.
The
challenges of identifying, obtaining and managing index data and
constructing benchmarks is growing, and shows no signs of getting
any easier. Manual and/or decentralized data management practices
and processes are not providing the flexibility and responsiveness
demanded by the investment professionals and client service teams
at asset management firms.
At the Technology Council™ meetings in London on November 15 and New
York on November 28, CutterResearch will present a detailed review of index
data providers and member challenges and practices around maintaining and using
indices and benchmarks.
Cutter Associates makes investment management firms
more competitive through 3 specialized complementary services: research, benchmarking
and consulting. |
 |
| Upcoming
Events |
| October 2007 |
Cutter Executive
Roundtable™ |
Oct 2
London |
Performance Attribution
Seminar |
Oct 3
London |
Order Management and
Compliance Systems –
The Technology Council
Update Service™ |
Oct 11
Oct 12
Webcast |
The Technology
Roundtable™ |
Oct 17
New York |
| Wrestling with Derivatives |
Oct 18
Webcast |
Data Management
Organizations |
Oct 25
CutterCast |
| November 2007 |
OMS User Series:
Linedata |
Nov 1
CutterCast |
UK Data Management
Group™ |
Monthly
London |
Supporting Investment
Management in a
Global Environment and
Benchmarks: Providers
and Practices –
The Technology Council™ |
Nov 15
London
and
Nov 28
New York |
Supporting Investment
Management in a
Global Environment and
Benchmarks: Providers
and Practices –
The Technology Forum™ |
Nov 15
London |
| December 2007 |
Derivatives
Front-End Systems |
Dec 6
Webcast |
| Billing Systems |
Dec 20
CutterCast |
| CutterBenchmarking™ 2007 |
• Global Operating Models
• Enterprise Architecture
• CRM
• Outsourcing
• Supporting Alternative Investments
• Trading
• IT and Operations Priorities |
| CutterMetrics™ 2007 |
• Trading
• Compliance
• Portfolio Management
• Corporate Actions and Settlement |
| CutterMetrics™ 2008 |
• Data Management
• Performance Measurement/ Attribution
• IT Operations and Priorities
• Client Reporting and CRM |
If you have any questions or require help with
registering, please contact:
Beth LaGambina
CutterAssociates
+1 781 934 7720 ext. 100
|
|