| Where are firms devoting the
greatest focus in 2007? |
John: The high demand has come
from several areas that include:
- Data management
- Front office automation for fixed income, derivatives
and alternative investments
- Investment Administration Outsourcing
- Regulatory changes
|
| Data driven initiatives have
seen a lot of traction in the past 18 months. What specifically
is surfacing this year? |
| John: In our Assessment and Strategy
practice we are spending the majority of our time helping firms
in the areas of data management, focusing on process, quality and
integrity. While most of the larger firms are well underway in
establishing more robust data management capabilities, they continue
to face challenges dealing with the more complex instruments including
fixed income, derivatives and alternative investments. These asset
classes are often processed outside in silos and manual workarounds. |
 |
| As the search for alpha continues,
what plans do firms have in place to address front office automation
of fixed income, derivatives and alternatives investment strategies? |
John: I wouldn’t say just
alpha but risk adjusted alpha. The largest challenge managers have
today is a complete understanding of the implied risk in a given
portfolio especially when they are investing in basket derivatives.
Many systems are not able to properly represent the shape of the
yield curve to the detail required for curve risk.
The other general need is to be able to have more robust ‘what
if’ capabilities that enable you to run risk scenarios prior
to implementing a trade idea. Currently, most firms can only run
scenarios daily at best. While there are several systems that enable
a manager to run intraday, the integration with intraday positions
remains a challenge.
In the coming year I think we will see firms continue to move
to faster access to portfolio risk data and attempt to bring the
analytics and order management closer together. The vendor market
is making strides to provide this but there will still be significant
internal building happening as well. |
 |
| As the options for outsourcing
investment administration become more mature do you see this route
as a more viable option for asset managers? |
John: Outsourcing remains a high
interest item as asset managers seek to reduce operational risk,
gain access to offshore resources/pricing, manage escalating costs
relating to Sarbanes Oxley, and lessen the dependency on finding
qualified staff. The large custodian firms are beginning to better
understand the needs of the buy side and are making some progress
in establishing the infrastructure to support those needs. However,
for this business area to be cost effective for both the investment
firms and the outsourcers, the providers need to establish internal
scalable systems and move away from lift outs.
As an aside, many of the front office vendors are now offering
ASP services as well to meet the demands of smaller clients with
little IT capacity. Another driver for this is the escalating costs
relating to Sarbanes Oxley compliance. |
 |
| There are so many external pressures
driving initiatives. How are regulatory changes impacting asset
managers? |
John: On the regulatory front,
Liability Driven Investment (LDI) is gaining traction in the investment
processing
space. Recent legislation in Europe and the US is requiring corporations
to report unfunded liability data on their financial statements.
This is creating a tighter connection to liability streams and
impacting the investment goals of the asset manager. Our European
clients seem to be farther along on this as they faced the regulatory
changes earlier than the US.
While insurance companies have always had an acute focus on matching
liability characteristics to the investment process, new legislation
has brought this thinking into the institutional asset management
area. Many firms are wrestling with defining and acquiring system
capabilities to support this change. It is still not clear how
much the asset managers have to expand their capabilities in the
liability planning at this stage. Up to now, institutional managers
have operated on total rate of return mandates. In the future,
they will also have to pay attention to projected cash flows from
the plan sponsors. It will be interesting to see just how far the
asset managers will get into the liability business. In some cases,
managers may begin to offer actuary advisory services along with
the asset management. |
 |
| What do you see on the horizon
for 2008 budgets? |
John: Spending seems to correlate
directly to the health of the capital markets. Given that, we believe
spending will continue to increase modestly in 2008. However, we
are also seeing firms trying to be smarter about spending those
dollars and they look to CutterConsulting to tie spending to strategic,
rather than tactical, areas.
Firms continue to increase spending on regulatory compliance. With
new projects going forward an additional overhead to remain in
compliance has to be funded. In the past two years, development
dollars for new capabilities have remained constant, and even declined
slightly, although budgets have increased. The bulk of budget increases
have been expended on the more intense focus on compliance. |