April 2005 • Issue 23
   
Equity Trading 2010

April 2005

The Technology Council Update Service™
April 12, 2005
Topic: Trade Order Management Systems

May 2005

The Technology Roundtable™
May 12, 2005
Topic:
Technology Strategies for Regulatory Compliance

June 2005

The Technology Council™
June 7, 2005 London
June 14, 2005 New York
Topics: Derivative Systems and the Future of the Trading Desk

The Technology Forum™
June 8, 2005 London
Topic: Data Management

September 2005

The Technology Alliance™
September 19th and 20th, Boston

October 2005
The Technology Council Update Service™
October 6, 2005
Webcast
November 2005
The Technology Roundtable™
November 16, 2005 New York
December 2005

The Technology Council™
December 6, 2005 London
December 14, 2005 New York

The Technology Forum™
December 7, 2005 London


Most asset managers have automated the trading and compliance function through the deployment of an industry leading OMS. However, with firms looking to trading to bolster their performance and with regulators insisting on proving the client got best execution, leading investment management firms are now planning to deploy "heavy duty" analytic tools on their trading desks to increase performance and accountability. These tools will enable firms to trade better, faster, and in a more controlled and transparent manner, but implementing these tools will be a major challenge to the IT department in any investment management firm.

Algorithmic Trading and Smart Order Routing
While most large managers already employ algorithmic trading and smart order routing, they typically use the capabilities offered by the sell side or outside services. Cutter's survey of over 80 investment management organizations indicated that traders overwhelmingly preferred algorithmic trading capabilities to be proprietary and embedded in their own OMS. Over the next five years more and more managers will bring algorithmic trading and smart order routing in-house, using their own, proprietary algorithms as well as those provided by vendors. Investment management firms and vendors will also develop methods for evaluating various algorithmic trading and order routing models and for adapting models to new market conditions.

Pre-Trade and Real Time Risk
Pre-trade risk management functionality will join pre-trade compliance, so that portfolio managers and traders can see the risk, as well as the compliance implications of their orders and trades. This functionality will allow the managers to allocate their risk, just as they now allocate their holdings. Real-time risk will also enable traders to manage their book to add minimum risk to that of the underlying portfolio.

Trade Impact and Trade Evaluation
Soon standard practice among the leading managers will be to include trade impact analysis as part of the portfolio manager's decision process. This means that orders will come to the trading desk with more explicit execution instructions, which may cause some tension between traders and portfolio managers. On the trading desk real-time trade impact and trade evaluation capabilities will assist in executing orders.

Other Functionality
Other analytic tools will assist the trader on timing strategies, price discovery, market depth, volatility analysis, and trading costs. Over the last twenty years some have predicted, in error, that expert systems will drastically change how the trading desk operates. These projections will finally begin to come true over the next few years, as traders turn to rule-based systems to assist them in automatically handling orders that would not benefit from active trading and in prioritizing and presenting those that need the trader's attention. Without such assistance traders will become bogged down in the minutia that the new analytic systems will provide.

Migration

As noted above, trading-orienting functionality will migrate over the next few years from outside the firm to the trader's desk and even further on to the portfolio manager. The portfolio management function will include information on trading costs, price volatility, liquidity analysis, market depth and implementation shortfall for each security and each strategy. As portfolios are constructed and rebalanced, logic that includes "smart rebalancing" and measures potential market impact will become standard. Thus, before trades are even submitted to the trading desk, they will be optimized for trading costs.

Can the OMS Vendors Help?
Some OMS vendors will ignore these trends, become relegated to the position of operational record keeper for the trading function, and, we believe, eventually fail. Others will see the opportunity inherent in the changes and attempt to develop the required analytic functionality themselves. In doing so, these vendors are "stepping into the ring" with the likes of ITG, AES, Portware, Algorithmics, and other successful analytic vendors. We do not think these vendors will succeed.

The smart OMS vendors will acquire or establish partnerships with analytic firms and provide integration between the OMS and analytics. The really smart vendors will include several top analytic systems in each functional area.

 

For information about Cutter Associates, Inc. visit http://www.cutterassociates.com/

Provide comments.
Unsubscribe.

Copyright 2002-05 Cutter Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved.