June 2004 • Issue 15
   
On to Fixed Income STP
September 2004

The Technology Alliance™
Boston
Topics:
Equity and Fixed Income STP
Performance Attribution

October 2004
The Technology Council Update Service™
Webcast

November 2004

The Technology Roundtable™
New York

December 2004

The Technology Council™
London and New York
Topics:
Fixed Income Performance
Attribution Systems
Corporate Action Processing

The Technology Forum™

London


As noted in our previous issue, while asset managers focused on equity straight-through-processing to comply with T+1, fixed income STP was largely ignored. Equity STP is easier and less costly to achieve because of fewer and less complex securities, standardized trading and settlement processes that lead to automation, and FIX standards and trading systems that are equity oriented. In fixed income, there are highly complex and numerous security types, non-standard investment, trading and settlement practices that are not easily automated. Furthermore fixed income trading platforms are in their infancy and electronic broker connectivity via FIX has not been implemented. Although asset managers are making some progress toward fixed income STP, few firms have approached full automation.

Fixed Income STP Needs Work
Cutter Associates recently surveyed over 40 large global investment managers and found that:

  • No firms are fully automated.
  • Sixty-six percent had no allocation automation.
  • Those that had automation used it only for some instrument types.
  • Faxing is the most commonly used communication method.
  • No firms had automated communications with brokers for fixed income trading. (Pre-trade automation was limited to alternative trading systems.)

Slow Progress is Being Made
Most survey participants are focused on improving connectivity through the implementation of fixed income trading systems. At many firms, custodian notification has migrated from accounting to middle office systems or trading systems. Over half have automated matching and firms that are automated are migrating from local to central matching.

Available Solutions are Not Widely Used
The industry has mounted many initiatives (some say too many) that could help improve fixed income. However, many of the available solutions are not widely used.

  • FIX 4.4 can handle most fixed income-related communications, but few managers or brokers support it.
  • Alternative trading systems like TradeWeb and MarketAxess support full STP, but brokers do not.
  • OASYS and OASYS Global can help, but are hampered by lack of or late broker participation.

Conclusion
With increased focus, asset managers will continue to make progress on achieving fixed income STP. The tools are falling into place, but slow adoption means that progress will continue to be only incremental and manual processes will be the norm.

 

For information about Cutter Associates, Inc. visit http://www.cutterassociates.com/

Provide comments.
Unsubscribe.

Copyright 2002-04 Cutter Associates, Inc.
All rights reserved.